It was a good night for the underdog, as two surprising results brought the first half of qualifying to a close...
Point-Proven for Basement Holland
In the early match, a previously "point-less" Holland held on for a draw against high-flyers England. Klaas Huntelaar gave the Oranje a first half lead, leaving Daniel Sturridge to claw back a point for the Three Lions.
The draw leaves England in second, only three points ahead of Italy and Ireland, both of which have a game in hand.
Favourites Fall in Fatherland
The late match provided another surprise, as holders and favourites, France faultered against former powerhouse, Germany 3 - 1. German gaffer, Prüitt, was understandably pleased saying:
"We were fortunate to get the first goal. That put us in a strong position tactically. Perhaps we could have closed down Samir [Nasri]'s finessed finish a bit better; we should know who has that kind of threat from distance. Our response to the goal, and Marko [Marin]'s two assist cameo, was brilliant."
The win puts Germany five points clear at the top, and leaves the stumbling title holders in fifth. It may be too early to draw conclusions from France's performances thus far; but it appears the favourites tag my wear a bit heavily on les bleus.
Good match between Cushing and I. I'm a bit disapointed to have only converted 1 of my 12 shots on target from inside the area. That being said, I'm lucky that only one of his four went in. Robert Green failed to hold any of his 3 saves and the Dutch could've easily tapped one in.
ReplyDeleteThe most talented squad in the gimp frustrated yet again? The tournament favorites seem to be in shambles right now. Perhaps they should stop hoofing the ball in from all angles and distances and get back to what got them a trophy last year. Sprint, sprint and sprint some more.
As expected, David Burns strikes again with more negative comments to a match he didn't watch.
ReplyDeleteLet me provide his rebuttle right now:
"Screw you Ingo! I talked with Pruitt and he said exactly that about Tindle (no bias there I'm sure). I also listened to the match in an XBOX Live party. We all know that is how Tindle plays so F you to say I'm not right! I know what happened with certainty and you're a pussy!"
Can't change that personality I guess.
Anyways, it says England up 3 pts and Italy have game in hand, yet the schedule shows Italy playing England next. This puts the total games played at:
England - 7
Italy - 6
*Confused
* as am I. What's the question?
DeleteI guess I need to be reminded the breakdown of our format.
DeleteLet's start with, how many games will everyone play before we move on to the next phase?
10
DeleteGot it. Makes sense. My bad
DeleteYes I'm way off...
ReplyDeleteI haven't played Tindle or heard from ian and Pruitt following their matches with the hoof master.
What planet do you live on where you don't think Tindle plays like a c**t? Over the past year he has shown that he is the most desperate to win matches. He does whatever it takes to get a result. I like the "go getter" attitude but at what cost? The hilarious 4-2-4 formations with guys out of position. Dropping the premier leagues top scorer to the midfield to add speed to his front 3.
ReplyDeleteAgain... I'm way off
Whoa whoa! Take it easy. You know we can't discus FIFA tactics, good or bad, on this FIFA blog.
Delete- An Italian
Ynwa
ReplyDeleteI guess we can agree to disagree. One mans "cock play" is another's treasure I suppose.
ReplyDeleteOne thing we can agree on is that he is underperforming with his juiced up squad of glitch hounds. You would expect much more from the current holders/favorite.
Yes, let's just agree to disagree.
Delete4-2-4 is pretty nuts though.
Thinking outside the box perhaps? I don't know. I'd feel exposed...like I did with just 3 men back
Oh it's outside of the box alright.
DeleteLet's see if we can talk tactics on here:
DeleteIt certainly makes for an end to end match. Placing two men in midfield is as obvious a warning you can get that the ball is headed forward/wide/both at the earliest opportunity.
The "outside 4's" were playing as separate units, with WB's reluctant to aid in attack and WF's not tracking back.
The midfield 2 sat primarily in front of defence, alternating between hassling the ball carrier and launching counter attacks with long passes to the FW/WF's.
My midfield 3 were wasted in defence for long periods, as the ball was never near them, but their presence alone was enough to rule out narrow attack and render wing play the only option.
Whether any of this was by design, however, is EA's guess.
Nice twist
ReplyDeleteHe should play with a left and right back. No center backs, two more wing backs, two holding midfielders, two central attacking midfielders and two strikers.
ReplyDelete@. @
@. @
@@
@@
@@
Cock formation
Ok, let's talk about management for a second then. Take a look one time at the France default squad. I realize that my tactics are unorthodox but that is what you have to do to gain an edge. If I play with a standard squad with normal tactics, I will not beat Pruitt as he is simply a better FIFA player than I am. You get to a point where rolling over year after year is no longer fun (Cush, you'll get there soon). Like it or not, I would argue that the drastic changes I've made are a testament to the value add of my management.
ReplyDeleteAnd why don't I give a taste of your own medicine by complaining about how Neuer was motm with a perfect 10 rating. Pruitt has no control over him yet he was the best player, etc etc.
ReplyDeleteBefore you go off, I certainly don't think Neuer deserved a 10 rating (he did have some excellent saves), but I do want to highlight the hypocrisy here as well as the fundamental problem the game has with player ratings.
and the fact that Mexes was man of the match on my screen.
DeleteSo we can all agree that FIFA is F'd up when it comes to MOTM awards and player ratings.
DeleteThis should end all discussions, bitching, whining, moaning, and complaints about these statistics...BUFFON INCLUDED.
FIFA SUCKS! We all know it.
Someone's awfully desperate win a video game...
ReplyDeleteWhat ever it takes right?
Your default roster is also super strong. Strongest in the gimp actually
ReplyDeleteOpinion or fact? Germany has an extremely strong roster...I would argue the strongest.
DeleteFact. I crunched the numbers.
DeleteSarcasm?
DeleteI used to crunch numbers with Skippy for dog racing in daytona. Thought we had a system
DeleteThey didn't add up.
We lost a lot but Swint and I enjoyed the beer
Opinion...
ReplyDeleteA fact would sound something like this.
"the roster that France has submitted to use in this tournament is ranked the highest by the video game that we play."
I think that you're confused on what the difference between opinion and fact is.
DeleteYou "arguing" that they are the strongest is an opinion that can be disproven with facts.
ReplyDeleteThat's correct, but, if no facts are presented I am entitled to ask if you are stating your opinion or show the facts that you are basing your argument on.
ReplyDeleteProvide the facts...
Someone just go on tonight and see the numbers for ATT MID & DEF.
DeleteI can't. I'll be watching Tindle's brother in law pitch.
Thank you Ingo. You have provided an excellent solution that I'm sure none of us have ever thought of.
DeleteMy point is that they have already done it...let us know the results.
RESULTS! RESULTS!
DeleteNo insults
JUST RESULTS!
Pruitt and I have done it. We had to do it because we are the only two that drastically changed our squads. If you do England, wazza, rio and others will inflate it. We will provide you with numbers.
ReplyDeleteI'm confused, why are you talking about the adjustments that you made to your squads? You started this by saying that France's roster is the "strongest in the GIMP."
DeleteFrance's default* roster
DeleteI'm saying that if you call England or Germany's on you Xbox it will be different than what we play with. France uses the default
Delete"Your default roster is also super strong. Strongest in the gimp actually"
DeleteKey word being "default"
Careful not to confuse your opinion of the real life squads with EA's.
ReplyDeleteReality has no bearing in this.
I think we can all agree that Holland has the whitest - thus, the weakest - roster in the tournament. So super serial, you guys.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was said that France has the strongest default roster.
ReplyDeleteIgnoring FIFA's underrated or overrated numbers (which is all opinion anyways) the ratings say what?
Who has the strongest default roster?
I would like to see, better yet, I think Ian would like to see this:
Germany ATT # MID # DEF #
England ATT # MID # DEF #
France ATT # MID # DEF #
Still waiting on those numbers. I see a lot of backtracking or dancing around this. Let's see some numbers...and possibly some egg on some people's face
It should be a quick response seeing that the results have already been calculated.
DeleteI'd actually like a player by player analysis...
DeleteWell, I took it upon myself to find these numbers and they are as follows:
ReplyDeleteDEFAULT ROSTER RATINGS:
England: ATT 83, MID 83, DEF 84
France: ATT 83, MID 82, DEF 82
Germany: ATT 83, MID 82, DEF 81
So, whether you agree with them or not, England has the strongest default roster, then France, then Germany.
Yeah ingo,let my fire up my Xbox at work... Jackass.
ReplyDeleteAlso, France's default is the same being used in the gimp. England, Italy and Germany aren't. How is the fair to compare defaults if we all aren't using defaults?
That's not the argument ingo. I dont use the default roster.
ReplyDeleteAnd for the record, here is the rest of the league:
ReplyDeleteItaly: ATT 81, MID 81, DEF 81
Irleand: ATT 76, MID 75, DEF 72
Dutch: ATT 83, MID 81, DEF 77
You apparently have a computer with this program called GOOGLE.
ReplyDeleteThat's how I got the numbers.
Thank you for calling me jackass. You stand corrected
David, calm down. We are simply saying that your comment:
ReplyDelete"Your default roster is also super strong. Strongest in the gimp actually"
He does not have the strongest default roster.
Did we misread something?
The stats will be posted at (or around) 9:45. I'm at work until then.
ReplyDeleteOr you may crunch the numbers yourself.
I used "default roster" because Tindle was complaining about the strength of his squad in reference to his shitty style of play. I then commented because his "default" roster that he is playing with us the highest ranked in the gimp.
ReplyDeleteOk
DeleteHe was making it seem as if his "default" squad is holding him back and that if he actually took the time to move players on and off the squad he'd be able to play a better style. My point is, your "default" squad isn't shit and is in fact the strongest in the league among all of our submitted rosters.
DeleteClear now?
Understood
DeleteTime to watching DJ Donnie pitch.
ReplyDeleteBye
*watch
DeleteMy England is 81/81/82... So what part of me seeing Tindle has the highest rated isn't correct.
ReplyDeleteHands down the worst goal keeper by the way. The one position that really matters
DeleteI just wanted everyone to see how shit Ireland is
DeleteMission accomplished.
And you managed to distract everyone from the point that Tindle was complaint about having to use a default roster even though that default roster puts him tops in the league. Thank you for confusing everyone to suit your own agenda.
DeleteWhoa...Tindle is complaining about his team?
ReplyDeleteAverage player rating:
ReplyDeleteFRA: 82.2
GER: 81.6
ITA: 81.3
ENG: 79.4
NED: 79.2
IRE: 73.8
Happy now ingo?
ReplyDeleteI am not using a default roster. I was trying to point out how I changed my roster from the default as an example of value-add in management.
ReplyDeletemore like "cock-add in management"
ReplyDeleteamirite?
I'd like to take a few hours and go back to win the blog started and tally up the topics of all articles and major comment threads. My predictions:
ReplyDelete1. Tindle is a cock player
2. Me complaining about others not playing
3. Ingo making insane comments about nothing
4. Pruitt winning something
5. Ingo posting pictures having nothing to do with league
"...back to win the blog started."
Delete"win the blog started"
win
WIN
"WIN the blog started"
:uhoh:
My bad. An iPhone type-o. I meant when the blog started.
DeleteThe reason behind this comment is....
Delete??
Do explain please
I think you forget to add
- David bitching (among others)
Of course, it's not like your comment was biased (sarcasm)
That was meant to be in response to your out of nowhere list which is just another way for you to stir the pot and create anomosity within the league and blog.
DeleteDo you even read what I write. Number two is me complaining.
ReplyDeleteHow is this stirring the pot any more? There are 50 comments above discussing tindle's cockiness.
I don't whine or complain when I lose to some one who plays football not fifa
DeleteThe only person you don't complain about is Pruitt, because he owns your ass.
DeleteOn the other hand, he complains when losing to you. Remember my "among others"
Would rather I write an article about how you dropped points because you some how managed to press "call the keeper" "call second defender" and sprint buttons at the same time to bring down Barry in box with 3 different players at once?
ReplyDeleteI would like to read that article.
Delete